Period Analysis of CY Aqr

Hello everybody!

My most recent observations of CY Aqr, an SXPHE variable star and a subdwarf located in the old disk of our Milky Way. These observations show a slightly longer fundamental period of 0.061046 ± 1.7e-5 d than that found in previous publications. The significance analysis of the fundamental period showed a false alarm probability of 0.000 ± 0.000, meaning the period calculated with the set of observations provided is very close to the actual fundamental.

This set comprises a total of 615 observations made with the Johnson V filter with my telescope installed in Starfront Observatories at Rockwood, TX. Each session was identified with a different color as follows:

Black dots: JD 2416989

Red dots: JD 2460991

Blue dots: JD 2460992

Fuchsia dots: JD 2460994

Maroon dots: JD 2460995

Acqua dots: JD 2460996

Green dots: JD 2461004

Yellow dots: JD 2461005


Figure 1 Observation set that includes eight sessions for a total of 615 observations with the Johnson V filter


Figure 2 Lomb-Scargle periodogram of CY Aqr, which shows a prominent period of 0.061046 days


Figure 3 Phased light curve of CY Aqr. The epoch considered was the one suggested by default by the light curve analysis software: JD 2460989.58655

If someone can contribute with new spectroscopic observations (whole visible spectrum) of this particular star, they will be most welcome.

Cheers!

Enrique
(BETB)

2 Likes

CY Aqr is a complex system with known period change.
See attached paper.

CY Aqr.pdf (4.7 MB)

1 Like

Hello Roy,

Yes, I was aware of that paper. Thanks for sharing it anyway! Just wanted to share my latest results and encourage more observers to follow this star. In the last 200 days or so, I have been the only one uploading fresh data of CY Aqr. It will be great if you can contribute too!

Cheers,

Enrique
(BETB)

Hi Enrique,
I can contribute. This star is also oin our list of HADS (High Amplitude Delta Scuti) stars.
Josch

1 Like

As an aside, I note that CY Aqr has long been of interest to the AAVSO. As long ago as 1936, Leon Campbell (then AAVSO Recorder, what we now term Director) wrote in his Variable Star Notes that CY Aqr was the variable with shortest known period and that no period change had yet been found. (Popular Astronomy, volume 44, 394). Of course, since then, variables of shorter period have been discovered and a period change has been seen. CY Aqr was one of the few high amplitude variables of its type that could be usefully observed visually.

1 Like

Hello Josch!

Your contributions are most welcome! One question though: do you normally transform your observations? That would be most appreciated.

I am now taking data with the Johnson B and V filters to help me transform it. I strongly advise you transform as well.

Cheers and thanks for your interest!

Enrique
(BETB)

Thanks for sharing this historical backdrop, which gives added interest to observe CY Aqr.

Cheers!

Enrique
(BETB)

Hi Enrique,
no I do not transform my data and I have no intention to do so.
Regards,
Josch

It is interesting for you to discuss a possible period change in CY Aqr. That latest paper would say that the period isn’t changing and that the variation in O-C is purely orbital. However, historically CY Aqr was also interpreted as having period breaks (abrupt period changes). As were many of the HADS (ex. XX Cyg). The idea of period breaks has long been considered a strong possibility in HADS. I agree it is worth watching more regularly. I’m not necessarily convinced with the results of that new paper.

I checked my spectral data and haven’t taken any on CY Aqr. I should have telescope time in January when I might be able to get an optical spectra (from H-beta to H-alpha) and perhaps JHK IR spectroscopy.

By the way your data looks very nice.

Eric