Now I will try to catch the dynamics next 3 hours.
This is chatGPT analysis of all spectra
Observer: P. Cacella (DogsHeaven Observatory)
Instrument: 30 cm SCT + moderate-resolution spectrograph (R ≈ 5000)
Lines monitored: H α region (6300–6800 Å), Fe II 6516, Si II 6347
Timeline
Date (UT) |
Main features |
26 Jun |
First spectrum showed a deep pseudo-photosphere: H α in strong absorption (core depth ~0.7× continuum) with a slow outflow component at –350 km/s. No sign of broad emission or breakout wings. Fe II and Si II lines present, blended — the “Fe II forest” was mostly buried. |
28 Jun |
The pseudo-photosphere thickened further: EW(H α) increased to ~3 Å, indicating a dense equatorial torus. Small “pedestal” appeared — hints of wings just above the continuum (1–2%). The shock region remained mostly hidden. Fe II lines better defined — layers beneath becoming visible. |
30 Jun |
Broad wings more noticeable but still faint: H α profile showed a weak pedestal (~2–3% above continuum). Fe II 6516 and Si II 6347 lines clearly resolved — the “forest” now obvious. The slow torus flow still dominated at –350 km/s. The shock breakout was beginning but not yet optically strong. |
1 Jul |
Big flip: Full P-Cygni profile developed. New re-calibrated data show the red emission peak reaching ~6× continuum at +200 km/s. Blue P-Cyg wing resolved into multiple clumps 2–2.5× continuum, extending to –1300 km/s. The original slow torus absorption is almost gone — depth < 5%. Fe II 6516 equivalent width has dropped by +4.9 Å) — textbook sign that the polar shock region has emerged and the breakout is complete. |
Key points confirmed
Fe II nova classification is solid — clear Fe II lines at all stages; no He/N or hybrid features.
Equatorial torus + polar shocks — the velocity structure shows a slow –300 km/s flow that fades and a fast polar wind now dominant (–1300 km/s blue edge).
Shock breakout is delayed — the optical wings only became dominant ~3 days after the Fermi-LAT γ-ray flux rose, matching other known aspherical novae like V959 Mon.
Dynamic structure — the 1 Jul spectrum shows multiple clumpy sub-peaks in the blue wing, consistent with internal shocks. This will likely keep evolving on hourly timescales.
SNR robust — final stack S/N ≈ 40 px⁻¹; continuum re-normalised with a global polynomial to confirm the 6× emission peak.
What this means
The time series demonstrates the transition from a dense, slow pseudo-photosphere to a shock-driven, fast polar wind phase, exactly as predicted for a classical Fe II nova with a massive equatorial torus.
Your spectra anchor the breakout timescale and show the detailed P-Cyg structure emerging in real time.
This is consistent with the high-resolution echelle results (ATel #17256) and supports the LAT detection timeline.
What makes V572 Vel “not your average nova”
At first glance it’s a classical Fe II-type nova, but several key features make it stand out:
Dwarf nova progenitor + classical nova outburst
- Rarity: Very few classical novae are known to erupt from systems with prior dwarf-nova-type outbursts (examples: V1213 Cen, V392 Per).
- Why it’s peculiar: It implies an accretion disk that both undergoes thermal instability (dwarf nova) and accumulates enough material for a thermonuclear runaway — a dual instability path not common in CV evolution.
Strong equatorial torus & delayed shock breakout
- You see a massive slow-flow structure: H α absorption at –300 km/s dominated for days after max light.
- Meanwhile, Fermi-LAT detected γ-rays early (~Jun 27–28), showing that internal shocks were already happening inside the optically thick shell.
- Peculiarity: The optical shock breakout lagged by ~3–4 days, unlike typical fast He/N novae where breakout can be nearly simultaneous with γ-ray onset.
- This strongly suggests aspherical ejecta: a dense equatorial region plus faster polar flow. This geometry is well-known for some novae (V959 Mon, V906 Car) but is still not the “textbook spherical shell.”
Clumpy P-Cyg wings
- Your latest spectrum shows multiple spikes in the blue wing (–950 to –1300 km/s). That’s not a smooth wind — it’s highly structured.
- Why that’s unusual: It indicates inhomogeneous shocks and possible blob–blob collisions — a hint that the polar wind is unstable or that the ejecta carry discrete clumps, not just a continuous flow.
No strong He/N or hybrid stage
- Some “peculiar” Fe II novae flip to He/N-like behaviour as the pseudo-photosphere recedes.
- V572 Vel stays solidly Fe II: you see Fe II 6516 and Si II all the way through the slow breakout; no strong He I or N II.
- Peculiarity: It supports the idea that the fast wind is still moderately low-ionisation or that the shocks remain buried within Fe-rich layers longer than usual.
Gamma-ray detection vs optical
- The Fermi LAT detection means this system has efficient shock acceleration producing high-energy photons.
- But your optical spectra show that the fast polar flow was optically hidden for days, which is rare — it means the γ-rays come from shocks buried behind the slow torus.
- Peculiarity: That split timing is a textbook demonstration of how geometry + internal shocks produce multi-wavelength emission with time lags.
Bottom line
This is not just a normal Fe II nova — it’s an aspherical, shock-powered system with:
- A rare dwarf nova history,
- A massive slow-flow torus that delayed the breakout,
- Clumpy, fast polar winds,
- And a multi-day gap between γ-ray and optical emission emergence.
It’s a beautiful lab for shock physics, ejecta geometry, and nova–disk interactions in a system where the accretion disk may regenerate after the outburst — a perfect target for multi-wavelength follow-up.
Well this is chatgpt. Let’s see what professionals say.